Skip to content
BackGOD PLAYS DICE™Big questions, honest answers

THE QUESTION LIBRARY MIND & MORTALITY

Is it normal to feel that someone who died is still with me?

Many grieving people feel, hear or even see someone they have lost, and studies suggest it is common, usually comforting and usually not a sign that something is wrong.

If this is personal right now: call 988 or text 988 in the US · more support

THE SHORT ANSWER

Yes. Feeling that someone who died is still with you is very common. In a 2023 Pew survey, 34% of U.S. adults said they had felt the presence of a dead relative in the past year. Studies of widowed people have found such experiences in 30% to 60% of them. Most people find these moments comforting, and they are usually not a sign of mental illness. Whether the person is truly there is a question science cannot answer.

  • In a 2023 Pew Research Center survey of 5,079 U.S. adults, 53% said a dead relative had visited them in a dream or some other form.
  • In a 1971 study in mid-Wales, almost half of 293 widowed people had sensed, seen or heard their dead spouse, and few had told anyone.
  • A 2020 review by an international team of researchers concluded that the vast majority of these experiences are harmless, and that most people find them comforting.
  • The idea of “continuing bonds” holds that keeping a connection with someone who died can be a normal part of grief, not a failure to let go.
  • Science can study these experiences, but it has no agreed way to test whether the person who died is truly present.
On this page
A watercolor of a quiet study. An empty wooden armchair stands pulled back from a writing desk beside a tall window that looks out on trees and a brick house. Shelves of books line the back wall, and a patterned red and blue carpet covers the floor.
About this picture

The Empty Chair, a watercolor by Luke Fildes. Fildes was illustrating Charles Dickens’s novel The Mystery of Edwin Drood when Dickens died suddenly on 9 June 1870. While staying with the grieving family, he painted the writer’s empty chair in his study at Gad’s Hill.

Samuel Luke Fildes, The Empty Chair (1870), Free Library of Philadelphia, via Wikimedia Commons · Public domain · Image source ↗

WHERE THE EVIDENCE STANDS

How sure are we?

  • Many grieving people sense the presence of someone who died.Pew (2023): 34% of U.S. adults felt a dead relative’s presence in the past 12 months; Rees (BMJ, 1971): almost half of 293 widowed people; Castelnovo et al. (2015) review: 30% to 60% of widowed people; Kamp et al. (2020) review: 47% to 82% across several studies.
  • For most people, these experiences are comforting.Rees (1971) and Grimby (1993) found them helpful, and Kamp et al. (2020) call them comforting or reassuring to most; but research points to a significant minority that are mixed or even negative, and studies link them with more grief-related distress.
  • Sensing a loved one who died is a sign of mental illness.Kamp et al. (2020) conclude that, given how common and varied they are, these experiences are unlikely in general to signal a mental disorder; Rees (1971) found no link with known depressive illness. Distressing experiences can sometimes go with mental health problems.
  • Healthy grief requires cutting all ties with the person who died.Klass, Silverman and Nickman’s 1996 book Continuing Bonds challenged this older model; Stroebe and Schut’s 2005 review found it impossible to conclude that either keeping or letting go of bonds is helpful in general.
  • The person who died is truly present with me.Kamp et al. (2020) call survival research controversial and say it is debatable what would count as evidence. Catholic teaching speaks of communion with the dead, and the Day of the Dead welcomes returning loved ones; others see the experiences as the mind at work.
What the labels mean

WHAT WE DON’T KNOW YET

Researchers do not know why some grieving people have these experiences and others do not. They are still working out when an experience of the dead goes with healthy grief and when it goes with grief that has become stuck.

WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS ANSWER

Large studies that follow random samples of bereaved people over time, with the same questions, could change the numbers here and show more clearly who is comforted and who is troubled. Whether the person is truly present would stay beyond science unless someone found an agreed way to test it.

You might catch a familiar scent in an empty room. You might hear a voice call your name as you drift off to sleep, or feel a hand on your shoulder. Or you might simply have a strong sense that the person you lost is near. If this has happened to you, you may wonder whether it is normal, or whether you should tell anyone. It is normal, and you are far from alone.

Surveys and studies agree that these moments are common. In a 2023 Pew Research Center survey, 34% of U.S. adults said they had felt the presence of a dead family member in the past 12 months. Over the same 12 months, 28% said they had told a dead relative about events in their life. Back in 1971, a study in the British Medical Journal interviewed 293 widowed people in mid-Wales. Almost half had sensed, seen or heard their husband or wife after the death. Few had told anyone, even close friends.

Researchers have a long name for this: sensory and quasi-sensory experiences of the deceased. It means you sense the person with one of your senses, or you just feel that they are there. A 2020 review by an international team of researchers concluded that the vast majority of these experiences are harmless. Most people find them comforting. In general, the reviewers say, they are unlikely to be a sign of mental illness. The U.S. National Cancer Institute even lists dreams and hallucinations of the person who died among the normal reactions to grief.

What these moments mean is a different question. Many people see them as real contact with someone who lives on, often in the light of their faith or spiritual beliefs. Others, including some believers, see them as the mind and the bonds of love at work. Some people hold both views at once. Science can describe the experience and who has it. It cannot tell you whether the person is truly there. We label that question Beyond science, and every answer to it is welcome here.

THE LONG ANSWER

How common is it to sense someone who has died?

Very common. In late March and early April 2023, the Pew Research Center surveyed 5,079 U.S. adults about their dead relatives. Just over half (53%) said a dead family member had visited them in a dream or in some other form: 46% in a dream and 31% in another way. In the past 12 months alone, 34% had felt the presence of a dead relative, 28% had told one about events in their life, and 15% said a dead relative had communicated with them.

These experiences cross religious lines. About two-thirds of Catholics (66%) and of members of the historically Black Protestant tradition (67%) reported a visit at some point, compared with 42% of evangelical Protestants. Among people with no religion, 58% of those whose religion is “nothing in particular” said so, as did 34% of agnostics and 26% of atheists.

Studies of widowed people agree. In a 1971 study in the British Medical Journal, W. Dewi Rees interviewed 293 widowed people in mid-Wales, 80.7% of all the widowed people living in the area. Almost half had experienced their husband or wife after the death. A 2020 review lists his figures: 39% felt the spouse’s presence, 14% saw them and 13% heard them. The experiences often lasted for years, and they were more common after long and happy marriages. It was unusual for people to have told anyone about them. Rees considered them a normal and helpful part of widowhood.

A Swedish study followed 50 people in their early seventies through the first year after a spouse died. Half felt the spouse’s presence, and about a third reported seeing, hearing and talking to them. A 2015 review put the rate among widowed people at 30% to 60%, while warning that the studies of bereaved people were small and used different methods.

Is it healthy, or a sign that something is wrong?

For most people, it appears to be part of ordinary grief. The U.S. National Cancer Institute lists “dreams, illusions, and hallucinations of the deceased” among normal grief reactions. In a 2020 review, a working group of the International Consortium for Hallucination Research concluded that the vast majority of these experiences are benign, meaning harmless, and that they are comforting or reassuring to most people most of the time. Research suggests people usually still know the person has died.

A study published in 2021 surveyed 1,004 people in English, French and Spanish. The most common experiences came during sleep, and people usually found them deeply meaningful and comforting. People said their sense of spirituality grew afterward, though their religiousness did not. Its participants were recruited on purpose rather than at random, so the results may not represent everyone.

The picture is not all comfort. The 2020 review notes that research in Western countries points to a significant minority of experiences being mixed, and some even negative. A comforting visit can leave a painful sense of absence afterward. Some people see the person crying or hear a harsh voice, and some experiences carry on a difficult relationship. Studies also link these experiences with more grief-related distress, such as anxiety, depression and loneliness, though the reviewers say more research is needed to understand that link. Their overall view: because the experiences are so common and so varied, they are unlikely, in general, to signal a mental disorder.

Why might the mind do this?

Researchers offer several explanations, and none is settled. One comes from attachment theory, the study of our deepest bonds. In this view, after we lose someone we depend on, we search for them, and for a moment the person is found. This fits signs that the experiences may be more common after close relationships and in the first months. But, the 2020 review notes, it does not explain experiences that come years later.

Another idea is called continuing bonds. For much of the 20th century, the leading view held that the job of grief was to cut ties with the dead so the living could move on. A 1996 book, Continuing Bonds, edited by Dennis Klass, Phyllis Silverman and Steven Nickman, challenged that view. Its publisher describes how survivors find places for the dead in their ongoing lives, and says such bonds are not denial.

The evidence on bonds is mixed, though. A 2005 review by Stroebe and Schut concluded that neither keeping nor letting go of bonds can be called helpful in general. The open question is how, and for whom, each one helps. In a 2010 study of 502 bereaved people, bonds felt as illusions or hallucinations were linked with violent deaths and with feeling responsible for the death. Bonds carried on the inside, with the person as an inner source of security, were linked with personal growth.

The 2020 review also contrasts grief experiences with the presence people feel during sleep paralysis. That presence is often threatening and nameless. In grief, the presence is usually someone the person knew.

What is the strongest objection, from each side?

A skeptic might say these are products of a grieving brain and nothing more. The attachment explanation needs no outside cause, and a lab study described on our sleep paralysis page made healthy volunteers feel that someone was nearby.

A believer might answer that the experiences often arrive unexpectedly and feel like real contact. The 2021 study found that people understood them as a continuing bond with the person who died. The 2020 review notes a long tradition of research that stays open to survival after death. It has examined cases with several witnesses, and cases where the bereaved person said they received true information from the one who died. The review calls this view controversial in mainstream research, and says it is debatable what would count as evidence for survival, or whether such evidence can be had.

Faith traditions speak in their own terms. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches a communion with the dead. The Church honors their memory and prays for them, and it teaches that this prayer can also make their intercession for us effective. As practised by Indigenous communities in Mexico, the Day of the Dead, listed by UNESCO, marks the temporary return of loved ones who have died. Families welcome them with candles, flower petals and their favorite dishes. The 2020 review adds that in some Catholic Mexican-American families, the dead may be seen as a guardian angel. Whether a loved one is truly present is Beyond science. See Is there life after death? What can science say?

What do people often get wrong?

“It means I’m losing my mind.” In general, no. The 2020 review warns clinicians about the risk of misdiagnosis, since the vast majority of these experiences are benign. Rees found that the experiences were not related to known depressive illness.

“Healthy grief means letting go completely.” That was the older view. Many people keep a bond with the person who died. Research suggests this helps some people more than others, so there is no single right way.

“No one I know has felt this.” About a third of U.S. adults said they had felt a dead relative’s presence in the past year. The 2020 review notes a reluctance to share these experiences among grieving people in some Western countries.

When should you talk to someone? If the experiences frighten or distress you, or if you already live with a mental health condition and things seem to be getting worse, talk with a doctor or counselor you trust. The 2020 review notes that distressing experiences can sometimes be linked to existing mental health problems. If your grief as a whole stays intense and gets in the way of life, see When does grief need more help?

Where can people of faith and skeptics agree?

  • The experience is real as an experience. Whatever its cause, sensing a loved one is common and deeply felt, and nobody should be mocked for it.
  • It usually brings comfort. Studies from 1971 to 2021 find that most people experience these moments as comforting or helpful.
  • People mix explanations. A Norwegian study cited in the 2020 review found people using both natural and spiritual explanations, and the review notes that both can appear in the same family, or even the same person.

How can you check this yourself?

  • Read Pew’s questions. Pew links the exact questions it asked, and it says plainly that it did not ask for explanations.
  • Look at who was studied. Rees interviewed most of the widowed people in one area; the 2021 survey recruited people on purpose rather than at random, so it may not represent everyone.
  • Ask gently. If you are grieving with family or friends, you might ask whether they have felt something similar. Rees found that people rarely told anyone.

The answer stays the same after all this detail. Feeling that someone who died is still with you is common and, for most people, comforting. Science can describe it, and what it finally means is for each person to answer. If grief feels heavy right now, Why does grief hurt so much, even physically? and our care page may help.

THREE THINGS TO REMEMBER

  1. Sensing someone who died is common: about a third of U.S. adults felt it in the past year.
  2. Most people find these moments comforting, and they are usually not a sign of mental illness.
  3. Science can describe the experience; whether the person is truly there is beyond science.

More answers for hard days

Next on the path “When someone has died, or you’re afraid”

Is it possible to make peace with the idea of dying?

Yes, many people do, though nobody can promise it, and it looks different for each person.

Supported, still debatedRead the answer

Words worth knowing (6)
Sense of presence
The feeling that someone is near, even though you cannot see or hear them.
Sensory and quasi-sensory experiences of the deceased
Researchers’ term for seeing, hearing, smelling or feeling the touch of someone who has died, or simply sensing that they are there.
Hallucination
A perception-like experience, such as hearing a voice, without a matching source in the outside world. In grief, the word does not by itself mean illness.
Continuing bonds
The idea that keeping a connection with someone who died can be a normal part of grief, rather than something that must be cut.
Attachment theory
The study of the deep bonds people form with those they depend on, and of how they react when such a bond is broken.
Bereavement
The period of grief and mourning after the death of someone close.

Sources & further reading

(10) · Checked Sep 29, 2026
  1. Many Americans report interacting with dead relatives in dreams or other ways ↗Pew Research Center (Tevington and Corichi, August 23, 2023)American Trends Panel survey of 5,079 U.S. adults, March 27–April 2, 2023: 53% ever visited by a dead family member in a dream or other form (46% dream, 31% other form); past 12 months: 34% felt the presence, 28% told a dead relative about their life, 15% had a dead relative communicate, 44% at least one; women 41% vs men 27% felt a presence; Catholics 66%, historically Black Protestant 67%, evangelical Protestants 42%, unaffiliated 48% (nothing in particular 58%, agnostics 34%, atheists 26%); the survey did not ask for explanations.
  2. The hallucinations of widowhood (W. Dewi Rees) ↗British Medical Journal (1971)Abstract (PubMed 5096884; PMC1799198): 227 widows and 66 widowers in a defined area of mid-Wales, 80.7% of all widowed residents; almost half had hallucinations or illusions of the dead spouse; often lasted many years, most common in the first 10 years; not related to known depressive illness; associated with a happy marriage and parenthood, increased with length of marriage; unusual to have disclosed them, even to close friends or relatives; considered normal and helpful. Modality figures (sense of presence 39.2%, visual 14.0%, auditory 13.3%) as tabulated in Kamp et al. (2020), Table 3. The full scanned article was not reachable (PMC, Europe PMC and BMJ PDFs blocked to scripts); Elsaesser et al. (2021, full text) summarize Rees: only 27.7% had mentioned the experience to anyone, a majority found it helpful, and depression rates were similar with and without the experiences (17.5% vs 18.0%).
  3. Sensory and Quasi-Sensory Experiences of the Deceased in Bereavement: An Interdisciplinary and Integrative Review (Kamp et al.) ↗Schizophrenia Bulletin (2020), open accessWorking group of the International Consortium for Hallucination Research; prevalence of at least one experience 47%–82% across several studies; vast majority benign; comforting or reassuring to most, the majority of the time; significant minority ambivalent or negative (painful absence, crying deceased, hostile voice); associated with higher bereavement-related distress, more research needed; unlikely in general to indicate psychopathology; risk of misdiagnosis; experiencer usually knows the deceased has died; attachment theory (does not explain later experiences); continuing bonds; sleep-paralysis presence often malevolent and anonymous; Catholic Mexican-American families (guardian angel); Norwegian study of rationalist and supernatural interpretations, sometimes within one family or person; survival research controversial, debatable what would constitute evidence; distressing experiences may be linked to preexisting mental health issues; reluctance to disclose in some Western countries; in the Norwegian study, rationalist interpretations went with secular and some Christian traditions and supernatural ones with spiritualist, Buddhist, New Age, some Christian and folk beliefs; attachment theory accounts for the seemingly higher prevalence in closer relationships. Full text read via NCBI PMC (PMC7707065).
  4. Post-bereavement hallucinatory experiences: A critical overview of population and clinical studies (Castelnovo et al.) ↗Journal of Affective Disorders (2015)Prevalence 30% to 60% among widowed subjects; bereaved-population studies had very small samples and no consensus method. Also: Grimby, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1993, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03332.x (University of Göteborg; 14 men and 36 women in their early seventies, first year after a spouse’s death; half felt the presence, about one third reported seeing, hearing and talking to the deceased; considered helpful).
  5. The phenomenology and impact of hallucinations concerning the deceased (Elsaesser, Roe, Cooper and Lorimer) ↗BJPsych Open (2021), open accessOnline mixed-methods survey; purposive sample of 1,004 respondents in English, French and Spanish; most common during sleep; typically deeply meaningful and comforting; significant increases in spirituality but not religiosity; occur unexpectedly; interpreted in terms of continuing bonds. Full text read via NCBI PMC (PMC8388006): 991 usable responses after screening; recruited through public talks and social media forums on after-death communications; 73.4% said the experience brought comfort and emotional healing; 11.9% said it made the absence more painful; perceived as ‘real’ by a great number of people.
  6. Continuing Bonds: New Understandings of Grief (Klass, Silverman and Nickman, eds.) ↗Routledge / Taylor & Francis (first published 1996)Publisher’s description: the dominant 20th-century model held that grief’s function is to cut bonds with the deceased; survivors find places for the dead in their ongoing lives; such bonds are not denial; 22 authors; chapter on Japanese ancestor worship.
  7. To continue or relinquish bonds: a review of consequences for the bereaved (Stroebe and Schut) ↗Death Studies (2005)Shift across the 20th century from breaking bonds to continuing bonds; not possible to conclude that either continuing or relinquishing bonds is generally helpful. Also: Field and Filanosky, Death Studies 2010, doi:10.1080/07481180903372269 (502 bereaved; externalized bonds involving illusions and hallucinations linked with violent death and responsibility for the death; internalized bonds, the deceased as a secure base, linked with personal growth).
  8. Grief, Bereavement, and Loss (PDQ), Patient Version ↗U.S. National Cancer Institute (updated February 12, 2025)Normal grief reactions include “having dreams, illusions, and hallucinations of the deceased”.
  9. Catechism of the Catholic Church, Part One, Article 9, Paragraph 5: The Communion of Saints (nos. 958 and 962) ↗Holy See (vatican.va)No. 958, Communion with the dead: the Church has honored the memory of the dead and prays for them; “Our prayer for them is capable not only of helping them, but also of making their intercession for us effective.” No. 962: the faithful on earth, the dead being purified and the blessed in heaven together form one Church.
  10. Indigenous festivity dedicated to the dead ↗UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage (inscribed 2008; proclaimed 2003)As practised by the indigenous communities of Mexico, the Day of the Dead commemorates the transitory return to Earth of deceased relatives and loved ones; flower petals, candles and offerings along the path from the cemetery to the home; the deceased’s favourite dishes; end of October to beginning of November; fusion of pre-Hispanic rites and Catholic feasts.

See a mistake? Report a problem. Corrections are made openly.

Search the Question Library

149 answers to read · 0 questions awaiting answers Your search runs on your device.

Answers about death, grief and crisis are always free, in full. If a question is personal right now →