Causality & light

In one minute

Author’s hypothesis

Test procedure frozen; real-data inputs not yet available; no faster-than-light claim made.

Status reviewed 30 September 2026. This page describes proposed research by the site’s author. It is not established science, and a public repository record is not peer review.

On this page

How would we test a claim about faster-than-light physics?

What the idea proposes

Author’s hypothesis. This project does not claim that anything travels faster than light. It asks a narrower question: if someone proposed a “hidden sector” (unseen particles or fields that barely interact with ordinary matter) that might allow faster-than-light effects, how should that claim be checked?

Ricardo’s answer is a procedure he calls the “Einstein Audit.” His current record says such a sector should be judged not only by its speed, but by how often its signals could lead to cause-and-effect paradoxes. The audit combines three checks into one score:

• How often, and how badly, its signals could cause paradoxes, times the extra energy it would add to the young universe.
• Whether pulsar-timing teams agree. Pulsars are spinning dead stars that tick like clocks.
• Whether newly merged black holes “ring” as Einstein’s theory predicts.

A model that passes gets the label “Einstein-allowed.” Both names are Ricardo’s own labels, not Einstein’s. Passing means a model met his score, not that physics permits it.

Version 1.2.1 (15 May 2026) freezes the steps for bringing in real data. It adds checks so practice files, toy data or summaries cannot be counted as real-data results by mistake. The real-data path stays locked until six input files exist.

What it claims, and what it does not

What it claims: a frozen, reproducible test procedure and software.

• The record states plainly that it does not claim evidence for faster-than-light physics. Every earlier version says the same.
• It contains no real-data results yet. It was tested only on made-up (synthetic) data, to show the steps run from start to finish. None of the audit’s four public versions reports a run on real data.
• It is not a spacecraft design and does not remove the ordinary speed limit of relativity.

What “real-data inputs not yet available” means. The real-data path unlocks only when six input files exist in the audit’s own format. Four would hold results: two from pulsar-timing data sets and two from black-hole mergers. Two would hold analysis choices: how ringdown results are turned into the audit’s single ringdown score, and a log of decisions. The record cites public pulsar-timing and ringdown data releases from 2022, 2023 and 2025. It does not say who will prepare the six files, or when. It does not publish the two analysis choices, and it does not say whether they will be fixed before the real data are seen.

Checks shared with HD-Blast. Ricardo’s book uses “guardrails” to test HD-Blast, his “higher-dimensional blast” idea about the universe’s hot beginning (God Plays Dice, Volume One, Chapters 6 and 7, and Glossary). The audit’s early-universe energy, pulsar-timing and ringdown checks are the same kinds of checks. The audit’s first version (26 November 2025) shared even more. It described the hidden sector’s gravitational waves with the same kind of bent curve that HD-Blast uses. It also scored whether pulsar-timing teams agree on where that curve bends. Since version 1.2.0 (5 February 2026), the audit’s records describe their scope as “FTL-only” (faster-than-light only), with no higher-dimensional blast content. Four records from Ricardo’s unification program, dated 6 January to 4 September 2026, list themselves on Zenodo as supplements to the audit’s first version. The book says passing a guardrail “does not prove the idea,” and every version of the audit says it does not claim evidence for faster-than-light physics. So passing a check the two share would not count as evidence for both ideas.

What changed since earlier versions. All four public versions were checked on 30 September 2026, using the text on their record pages; the files inside the records were not opened. Some wording in the records, including the current one, is stronger than this page. The list quotes some of that wording, with its date; this page does not adopt it.

• 26 November 2025 (v1.0.0, first version). It called itself a “testable framework” and an “analysis-only” kit, and said no real pulsar-timing or ringdown data were included. It also sketched a “toy” limit on how much information such signals could carry. Its plain-language summaries said faster-than-light speeds cannot be raised “arbitrarily” without a visible cost, and that “the available data already limit” such hidden sectors. Its press summary called it “the first systematic way to audit any such claim.”
• 13 December 2025 (v1.1.0). It called the project “a quantitative, testable audit” and added demo results and explainer files.
• 5 February 2026 (v1.2.0). It limited the scope to faster-than-light questions. It added the “Testability Gate”: for extremely fast signals, the audit sets a real limit only if the extra energy is above a threshold. That is narrower than the first version’s wording. Some example numbers were “REALDATA_APPROX placeholders,” stand-ins to be replaced with real data. One file name ends in “…_Breakthrough.pdf”; this page does not use that word for the idea.
• 15 May 2026 (v1.2.1, current). It froze the steps for bringing in real data and locked the real-data path, but it still has placeholder values. Its preferred pulsar-timing inputs are the signal’s strength and slope, not the bend the first version used. Its public overview uses words this page does not adopt: it calls the idea its “main breakthrough hypothesis” and says the audit “creates a falsifiable checklist.” The same overview says some models “may be structurally untestable.”

The strongest challenge

Einstein’s relativity is part of daily life. NASA notes that GPS would send you miles off course without it. Past “faster-than-light” results have not held up. In 2011 the OPERA experiment reported neutrinos arriving about 60 billionths of a second early. OPERA’s revised measurement found no meaningful difference from the speed of light. In June 2012, CERN said the early result could be traced to a faulty part in the experiment’s fiber-optic timing system. So any claim of a faster-than-light hidden sector starts against very strong evidence.

The audit’s own records also point to a limit of the method. Its current overview (15 May 2026) says a model may be neither allowed nor ruled out: it “may be structurally untestable.” Version 1.2.0 (5 February 2026) gives the condition, which it calls a “Testability Gate.” Paradox is multiplied by the sector’s extra energy. So a sector that adds very little extra energy can pass even with a lot of paradox. For extremely fast signals, the audit sets a real limit only if the extra energy is above a threshold. In the current version, the pulsar-timing and ringdown data only set how much room is left. They do not measure anything about the proposed sector. The more the pulsar-timing teams agree, and the closer the ringing is to Einstein’s theory, the more room is left. The limits themselves are settings. The first version (26 November 2025) gives default limits and lets users choose their own.

What would rule it out

This is a test procedure, not a prediction, so there is nothing yet to rule out. The audit states no dated prediction about what the data will show, and the Test Ledger lists it as “No public precommitted test.”

• Once the audit’s six input files exist, the frozen steps would show whether a proposed hidden sector fits what the data allow. Results outside that room would count against that hidden sector.
• Changing the procedure after seeing the real data would weaken any result.
• Some proposed hidden sectors may be out of the audit’s reach. For very fast signals from a sector that adds very little extra energy, it sets no real limit (see The strongest challenge).

Corrections

• 30 September 2026 · What the idea proposes: The page said a claim would have to pass several checks at once, starting with “causality (causes must come before effects).” That was not accurate. The audit does not require causes to come first. It measures how often, and how badly, a sector’s signals could let an effect come before its cause. It multiplies that by the sector’s extra energy and counts the result as one part of a combined score. The page now describes the score this way, and it no longer calls the procedure “strict” in its own words.
• 30 September 2026 · What the idea proposes: Two wording fixes. The page said version 1.2.1 “freezes that procedure.” The record says it freezes the workflow for replacing placeholder or demo inputs with real data, so the page now says it “freezes the steps for bringing in real data.” The page also said practice files could not be “passed off” as real results. The record’s overview speaks of files being promoted into real-data claims by accident, so the page now says “counted as real-data results by mistake.”
• 30 September 2026 · The strongest challenge: The page said “any hidden-sector claim starts against very strong evidence.” That was too broad. In physics, a “hidden sector” means particles that barely interact with ordinary matter, and many proposed unified theories predict one. The case against faster-than-light effects applies to faster-than-light claims, so the line now says “any claim of a faster-than-light hidden sector.”

Related questions in the Library

• Why is the speed of light the universe's speed limit?
• Is time travel possible?
• Why do extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence?

Member explainers

Author’s hypothesis · Status: Test procedure frozen (v1.2.1, 15 May 2026); real-data inputs not yet available; no faster-than-light claim made.

Author’s hypothesis. This project does not claim that anything travels faster than light. It asks a narrower question: if someone proposed a “hidden sector” (unseen particles or fields that barely interact with ordinary matter) that might allow faster-than-light effects, how should that claim be checked?

Does Ricardo’s Einstein Audit Allow Faster-Than-Light Travel? · Holy Grail collection, for All Access readers.

Sources

• Einstein Audit for Faster-Than-Light Hidden Sectors (FTL-only): A2 Strict Protocol Freeze and Provider-Return Gate, v1.2.1 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20218030) (2026-05-15) — What the procedure freezes, its claim lock, the six input files it still needs, its placeholder inputs, and its public overview (central idea, “Testability Gate,” stronger wording).
• The Research Desk, officialgodplaysdice.com (research snapshot 20 September 2026) (2026-09-20) — The field card, its question and the site’s own calibrated wording.
• OPERA Collaboration, Measurement of the neutrino velocity with the OPERA detector in the CNGS beam (final version) (2011-09-22 (revised 2012)) — Challenge: the revised measurement is consistent with the speed of light.
• OPERA Collaboration, same paper, first version (v1) (2011-09-22) — The original early-arrival anomaly.
• NASA Science, 10 Things Einstein Got Right (2019-05-29) — Relativity is built into GPS.
• Einstein Audit for Faster‑Than‑Light Hidden Sectors (FTL‑only): J‑First SR Envelope, Testability Gate, and A2 Real‑Data Scaffolding, v1.2.0 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18499411) (2026-02-05) — The “Testability Gate,” the “FTL-only” scope, the “REALDATA_APPROX placeholders” and a file name.
• Einstein Audit for Faster‑Than‑Light Hidden Sectors (MIN): Causality, Cosmology, and Multi‑Band Gravitational‑Wave Consistency, v1.1.0 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17926499) (2025-12-13) — The “Einstein-allowed” label, “a quantitative, testable audit,” and its demo results and explainer files.
• Einstein Audit for Faster‑Than‑Light Hidden Sectors (MIN): Causality Indices, Delta N_eff Guardrail, PTA Coherence & Ringdown GR Tests, v1.0.0 (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17726160) (2025-11-26) — The combined score and its three parts, the default limits users can change, the bent-curve and knee checks, and the first version’s stronger summaries (“In More Basic Terms” and “Press / Public Summary” on its record page).
• Listening Beyond Four Dimensions: Higher-Dimensional Blast — vLASTMILE+ Canonical Snapshot & Tool-Kit (HD-Blast; DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17968738) (2025-12-17) — HD-Blast’s bent curve with a knee, its cross-team “same knee” check and its early-universe energy check. It is the book’s frozen December 2025 record, not the newest HD-Blast version.
• Q3 Criticality and a Near‑Term Forecast for μ→e Conversion and μ→3e from an ε‑Lattice Bridge (CGFP) (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18165756) (2026-01-06) — A unification record that lists itself as a supplement to the audit’s first version (“isSupplementTo”).
• UNIFIED ε‑Lattice Locks and Modular Closure: π² Lock, Macro‑Generator Lemma (L=22), and Near‑Term Falsifiers (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18509529) (2026-02-06) — A unification record that lists itself as a supplement to the audit’s first version (“isSupplementTo”).
• UNIFIED ε-Lattice Locks and Modular Closure v2026.05.16: Determinant-Valuation Geometry, CKM Ultrametric Defect, Minimal Anomaly No-Go, and Spectator Completion Candidate (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20241403) (2026-05-16) — A unification record that lists itself as a supplement to the audit’s first version (“isSupplementTo”).
• Unified Theory of Everything Research Program: TOE-N00AK-r1 – Exact Tree-Level Majorana Kernels and a Dimension-Seven Scope Correction (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22319172) (2026-09-04) — A unification record that lists itself as a supplement to the audit’s first version (“isSupplementTo”).
• God Plays Dice, Volume One (Ricardo Maldonado), Introduction, Chapters 6 and 7, Appendix and Glossary (2026) — HD-Blast’s ringdown, pulsar-timing and early-universe energy “guardrails,” the book’s line that passing a guardrail “does not prove the idea,” its name for the idea (“higher-dimensional blast”) and its frozen December 2025 record (Appendix).
• CERN, OPERA experiment reports anomaly in flight time of neutrinos from CERN to Gran Sasso (with the update of 8 June 2012) (2011-09-23 (update 2012-06-08)) — Challenge: the early OPERA result could be traced to a faulty part of its fiber-optic timing system.
• J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 60, 405–437 (arXiv:1002.0329) (2010) — What a “hidden sector” means in physics.

See every committed prediction in one place: the Test Ledger. Back to the Research Desk. See a mistake? Report a problem; corrections are made openly.