Einstein CentennialFeature
The Dice Letter at 100: How One Sentence Shaped a Century of Physics
A century ago, Einstein told Max Born that "the Old One" does not throw dice, starting an argument that reshaped physics and is still not finished.
THE QUESTION LIBRARY EINSTEIN CENTENNIAL
Einstein’s own letters and essays show a man who rejected a personal God, refused the atheist label, and felt deep awe at the order of nature.

THE SHORT ANSWER
Einstein did not believe in a personal God who answers prayers or judges people. In a 1929 telegram, he said he believed in “Spinoza’s God,” a God seen in the lawful order of nature. Yet he refused to call himself an atheist, and he described a deep, “cosmic” religious feeling of awe. His famous line about dice was about physics, not faith. His own writings show what he believed; whether he was right is beyond science.
WHERE THE EVIDENCE STANDS
WHAT WE DON’T KNOW YET
Einstein never wrote one full, final statement of his beliefs. Some famous lines come from interviews that others reported, and translations of his German differ. Historians still debate which label fits him best.
WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS ANSWER
A newly found letter could add detail, or show that a famous quote was reported wrongly. The core answer would change only if new papers showed he privately believed in a personal God. That would clash with what he wrote for 25 years.
Einstein did not believe in a personal God. By that he meant a God who hears prayers, rewards and punishes, or steps into human lives. He said so many times, from 1929 until a year before he died. But he was not a simple atheist either. He turned down that label. He spoke instead of a deep awe at the order of the universe, and he was willing to call that feeling religious.
People ask because both sides quote him. Believers point to his line that “science without religion is lame.” Skeptics point to a 1954 letter that calls the word God a product of human weakness. Both quotes are real. Read alone, each one can mislead. The question also has a birthday this year. On December 4, 2026, his most famous line about God and dice turns 100.
The clearest answer came by telegram. In 1929, a New York rabbi, Herbert S. Goldstein, cabled him: “Do you believe in God?” Einstein wrote back that he believed in “Spinoza’s God.” That God, he said, shows himself “in the orderly harmony of what exists.” It is not a God who cares about the fates and actions of human beings. Baruch Spinoza was a thinker from Amsterdam in the 1600s. He wrote of “God or Nature,” as if the two were one.
So Einstein’s “God” was not a person watching over us. It was his word for the deep order of nature, and for the wonder he felt when he tried to understand it. He called that wonder “cosmic religious feeling.” He believed it drove the best science.
His letters and essays survive, so what he believed is Established. Which single word fits him best, such as pantheist, deist or agnostic, is still debated. Whether his view of God is true is a question science cannot settle.
The famous dice line came first. On December 4, 1926, Einstein wrote to his friend Max Born, a fellow physicist, about the new quantum theory. In the English translation published by Physics Today, he says an inner voice tells him the theory “is not yet the real thing.” Then he adds that he is convinced “He is not playing at dice.” “He” refers to “the Old One,” Einstein’s name here for God. The letter is about physics: whether chance sits at the bottom of nature. Our feature The Dice Letter at 100 tells that story.
In 1929, Boston’s Cardinal William O’Connell attacked Einstein’s theories as leading toward atheism, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported on April 28 of that year. That is why Rabbi Goldstein sent his telegram. Einstein’s biographer Walter Isaacson gives its full wording: “Do you believe in God? Stop. Answer paid. 50 words.” Einstein used about half of those words.
In 1929 Einstein also gave a long interview to the journalist George Sylvester Viereck. In the part printed in The Saturday Evening Post that October, he said he was a Jew but was “enthralled by the luminous figure of the Nazarene,” meaning Jesus. According to Viereck’s account, as quoted by Isaacson, he also said, “I’m not an atheist.” He compared all of us to a small child in a huge library full of books in languages it cannot read. The child senses an order in the books but does not know what it is.
In 1930 he set out his view in an essay, “Religion and Science,” for the New York Times Magazine. He described three stages of religion. First comes a religion of fear. Next comes a moral religion, built around a God who rewards and punishes. The third stage he called “cosmic religious feeling.” It knows no dogma and no God “conceived in man’s image,” he wrote. In this light, he said, Democritus, Francis of Assisi and Spinoza were closely akin. He called this feeling “the strongest and noblest motive for scientific research.” In the same essay he said that good ethics rests on sympathy, education and social ties, with “no religious basis” needed.
In a credo from 1930, known in English as “The World As I See It,” he wrote that “the most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious.” Sensing a reason and a beauty that our minds can barely reach, he said, is true religiosity. Then came a limit: “In this sense, and only this sense, I am a deeply religious man.”
In 1940 he wrote a paper on science and religion for a conference in New York, and the journal Nature printed it that November. There he described religion as the effort to get clear about values and goals, which science cannot supply: science can say what is, but not what should be. That is the setting of his famous line: “science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” In the same paper he said the main source of conflict between science and religion “lies in this concept of a personal God.” He urged religious teachers to give that idea up.
Finally, on January 3, 1954, a year before his death, he replied to a book by the philosopher Eric Gutkind. In this “God letter,” which sold at Christie’s in 2018 for $2,892,500, he wrote that “the word God is for me nothing but the expression and product of human weaknesses.” In Christie’s translation, he called the Bible a collection of “venerable but still rather primitive legends.” Other translations differ slightly.
Baruch Spinoza was born in Amsterdam in 1632, into the city’s Portuguese-Jewish community, and he died in 1677. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, in 1656 that community issued against him the harshest ban it ever pronounced, and it was never lifted. He wrote of “God or Nature” (in Latin, Deus sive Natura). For Spinoza, God is not a planner with goals. Everything follows from nature’s laws, and there are no miracles. The encyclopedia sums up his view: all talk of God’s purposes or plans is “an anthropomorphizing fiction,” a way of picturing God as if God were a human being.
That is the God Einstein pointed to: something close to the order of nature itself. Scholars add two twists. First, the encyclopedia’s author, Steven Nadler, argues that Spinoza did not think worship or religious awe was the right response to God or Nature; understanding was. Einstein, by contrast, wrote in 1940 of “profound reverence” for the order he found in the world. Second, the scholar Don Howard, as summarized by Weinstein, argues that Einstein’s God is closer to the ancient Stoic idea of logos, a rational order running through the cosmos. So “Spinoza’s God” was a useful shorthand, not a perfect match.
Some readers say Einstein’s “God” was only a figure of speech, so he was an atheist in all but name. There is real support for this. Galina Weinstein, a scholar in the University of Haifa’s philosophy department, argues that his references to God expressed ideas about order and understanding, “not theological affirmations.” Leopold Infeld, who wrote a popular physics book with Einstein, once remarked that Einstein used the word God “more often than a Catholic priest,” and Weinstein adds that he never used it in the usual religious sense. And the 1954 letter is blunt.
But Einstein himself pushed back on that reading. Isaacson reports that Einstein told a friend what made him “really angry”: people who say there is no God and “quote me for support of such views.” In a 1941 letter quoted by Weinstein, he wrote that “fanatical atheists” show the same kind of intolerance as religious fanatics. He rejected a personal God, as atheists do. He also embraced reverence and awe, and he did not want to be recruited by either side.
“God does not play dice” was a statement of faith. It was a statement about quantum physics. The 1926 letter speaks of “the Old One” and “He,” and the popular short form swaps in the word God. For Einstein, such God-talk was a vivid way of saying that nature follows exact laws.
“Science without religion is lame” shows he believed in God. In that same paper he asked religious teachers to give up the idea of a personal God. By “religion” he meant a striving for values, plus a faith that the world can be understood by reason.
“Einstein was an atheist.” He rejected a personal God, but he also rejected the label, as shown above.
“Einstein believed in the God of the Bible.” He admired Jesus as a figure. But in 1954 he wrote that no interpretation, “no matter how subtle,” could change his view of the Bible as a collection of legends.
A quote is reliable because it is famous. Weinstein warns that popular quote books often cut Einstein’s remarks loose from their original setting and language. Take the line “God is subtle, but He is not malicious.” It appears in German over a fireplace in Princeton’s old Fine Hall, now Jones Hall, as the Princetoniana Museum notes. Weinstein explains that it reportedly answered a puzzling physics experiment. Here “God” means the order of nature.
The answer holds after all this detail. Einstein rejected a personal God, refused the atheist label, and found something close to religious awe in the order of nature. Whether that order points to anything more is a question science cannot settle.
THREE THINGS TO REMEMBER
WHERE THE AUTHOR’S RESEARCH TOUCHES THIS
Author’s hypothesis. Ricardo Maldonado, author of GOD PLAYS DICE, borrowed Einstein’s dice image for his book’s title. In the Introduction, he calls the title “a playful act of rebellion, not a religious claim.” In the book, “God” is shorthand for the deep laws of nature. That is close to how Einstein himself often used the word. In Chapter 10, the author notes that Einstein’s remark has been repeated so often that “it has turned into a slogan.” He argues that randomness does not mean chaos: a die can be random and still obey strict rules.
The book’s central idea, HD-Blast, is the Author’s hypothesis that our Big Bang may be the aftershock of an event in a higher-dimensional space. It is a proposal about how our universe began. Einstein never said or predicted it. The book calls the idea falsifiable, which means specific evidence could prove it wrong. The Introduction also says the book does not claim to have proved anything about God.
WORDS WORTH KNOWING
KEEP ASKING
See a mistake? Report a problem. Corrections are made openly.